Publishing process
 
  1. The Author submits the paper to the Editorial Team using the editorial system https://www.editorialsystem.com/zeren. Before submitting the manuscript via the system, the Author makes sure that the file does not contain his/her name and surname or affiliation. Manuscripts which are not research papers are sent to the Executive Editor by e-mail.
  2. Upon receiving the manuscript, the Editorial Team verifies the information given by the Author, and in particular checks whether the Author attached signed scans of the copyright declaration and whether the file does not contain the names and surnames of the authors and their affiliations.
  3. The Editorial Team sends the article to Reviewers through the editorial system.
  4. After accepting the invitation to review a paper, the Reviewer downloads the full content of the paper from the panel and then evaluates it filling in a special review form. The Reviewer presents their opinion and suggests which decision should be taken by the Editorial Team. The Reviewer can choose one of the following decisions:
          1. accept without any changes,
          2. accept upon minor changes suggested by the Reviewers,
          3. accept upon major changes and re-review,
          4. reject.
    The decision taken by the Reviewer is only a suggestion, since the final decision concerning a particular paper is always made by the Editorial Team.
  5. The reviewed article is discussed at the meeting of the Advisory Board, which can take one of the following decisions:
          1. accept without any changes,
          2. accept upon minor changes suggested by the Reviewer,
          3. accept upon major changes and re-review,
          4. reject.
  6. In the case of "accept without any changes" and "accept upon minor changes suggested by the Reviewer", the Editorial Team sends the Author a request to correct the manuscript and sets a deadline for the submission of the corrected version.
  7. The Author uploads the corrected manuscript into the editorial system in accordance with the Reviewers' comments. The Author has the right to refuse to incorporate some of the Reviewers' comments on condition that he/she provides adequate justification for such action by leaving a comment in the editorial system.
  8. In the case of rejection of the article, the Author is notified by the editorial system.
  9. The revised article submitted by the Author is then reviewed by the Subject Editor.
  10. The Editorial Team makes the final decision about the article in the editorial system.
  11. After issuing the decision, a DOI number is generated.
  12. The paper is checked by Similarity Check, an anti-plagiarism tool.
  13. The article is sent outside the editorial system for typesetting and then for proofreading.
  14. After the proofreading, the Technical Editor makes suggested corrections or indicates any doubts raised by the Language Editor (missing bibliographic items, inconsistencies of figures in the text with the data in tables and graphs, linguistic ambiguities, etc.).
  15. After the corrections are made, the article is sent to the Authors for author's correction.
  16. The Technical Editor introduces author's corrections to the article.
  17. The article is sent for translation and then the translation is proofread.
  18. The articles are printed for final proofreading.
  19. After making corrections from final proofreading, the articles are published online in two language versions and printed out.
 
eISSN:2392-3458
ISSN:0044-1600